The Boston Public School Match
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Profile: Boston University School of Public Health at 40.
One building Dean Sandro Galea has no interest in erecting on the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) campus, MA, USA, is an ivory tower. “This is a school of believers”, Galea tells The Lancet. “We have faculty and staff who are drawn here because this is a school that does top-tier research but is deeply committed to real-world practice. The people who we attract are students wh...
متن کاملThe ‘Boston’ School Choice Mechanism
The Boston mechanism is a popular student placement mechanism in school choice programs around the world. We provide two characterizations of the Boston mechanisms. We introduce two new axioms, respect of preference rankings and rank-respecting Maskin monotonicity. A mechanism is the Boston mechanism for some priority if and only if it respects preference rankings and satisfies consistency, res...
متن کاملSchool-based obesity treatment: the MATCH program.
NCMJ vol. 74, no. 1 ncmedicaljournal.com percentile and below the 95th percentile is considered to be overweight; and one whose BMI is at or above the 95th percentile is considered to be obese. Because BMI is based on height and weight, which are regularly measured during primary care visits, obesity screening can occur at the same intervals as standard well-child care beginning at age 2 years....
متن کاملGames of School Choice among Boston Students∗
Traditionally, children in U.S. are assigned to public schools based on their home address. However due to equity concerns, school choice programs became increasingly popular in the past fifteen years. The best known of these programs, such as those in Boston, Cambridge, Minnesota, and Seattle, rely on a centralized student assignment procedure that we refer as the Boston mechanism. Truthful pr...
متن کاملSchool Choice: The Case for the Boston Mechanism
I study school assignment problems, focusing on two popular mechanisms: the Boston Mechanism (BM) and Deferred Acceptance (DA). The former has been criticized regarding both e¢ ciency and fairness, particularly its treatment of naïve (non-strategic) students. The latter has been suggested in its place, and has already replaced the former in several cities. The formal critique of BM and support ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Economic Review
سال: 2005
ISSN: 0002-8282
DOI: 10.1257/000282805774669637